4.6 Article

Endoplasmic reticulum stress actively suppresses hepatic molecular identity in damaged liver

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20199156

关键词

liver injury; NFIL3; PAR-bZIP; sepsis; super-enhancer

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEQ20150331724]
  2. European Genomic Institute for Diabetes (E.G.I.D.) [ANR-10-LABX-46]
  3. European Commission
  4. European Research Council (ERC Grant Immunobile) [694717]
  5. US National Institutes of Health [NIH 1RO1CA251698-01]
  6. Cancer Prevention AMP
  7. Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RP180349, RP190077]
  8. Welch Foundation [I-1805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver injury triggers adaptive remodeling of the hepatic transcriptome for repair/regeneration. We demonstrate that this involves particularly profound transcriptomic alterations where acute induction of genes involved in handling of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) is accompanied by partial hepatic dedifferentiation. Importantly, widespread hepatic gene downregulation could not simply be ascribed to cofactor squelching secondary to ERS gene induction, but rather involves a combination of active repressive mechanisms. ERS acts through inhibition of the liver-identity (LIVER-ID) transcription factor (TF) network, initiated by rapid LIVER-ID TF protein loss. In addition, induction of the transcriptional repressor NFIL3 further contributes to LIVER-ID gene repression. Alteration to the liver TF repertoire translates into compromised activity of regulatory regions characterized by the densest co-recruitment of LIVER-ID TFs and decommissioning of BRD4 super-enhancers driving hepatic identity. While transient repression of the hepatic molecular identity is an intrinsic part of liver repair, sustained disequilibrium between the ERS and LIVER-ID transcriptional programs is linked to liver dysfunction as shown using mouse models of acute liver injury and livers from deceased human septic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据