4.7 Article

Reagent-less amperometric glucose biosensor based on nanobiocomposite consisting of poly(1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione), poly(pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid), gold nanoparticles and glucose oxidase

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104665

关键词

Reagent-less amperometric glucose biosensors; Glucose oxidase; Poly(pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid); Conjugated polymers; Gold nanoparticles; Poly(1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione)

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund [01.2.2-LMT-K-718, 09.3.3-LMT-K-718-01-0063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a novel reagent-less amperometric glucose biosensor based on nanobiocomposite consisting of poly (1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione), poly(pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid) (PPCA), gold nanoparticles (AuNP) and glucose oxidase (GOx) was designed. To achieve this, the graphite rod electrode with adsorbed 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (PD) was immersed into electrochemical cell filled with a buffer solution containing pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid (PCA) and colloidal AuNP and electrochemical polymerization of PD and PCA was performed by cyclic voltammetry. During this process AuNP were encapsulated into PPCA layer. Carboxylic groups of the PPCA enabled the covalent immobilization of GOx. Optimal conditions for the biosensor working electrode preparation were elaborated and are discussed. The biosensor was characterized by wide linear range (0.2 -150.0 mM), relatively low detection limit (0.08 mM), good reproducibility (RSD 4.22 %, 2.34 % and 1.67 %, respectively for 5.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mM of glucose) and repeatability (RSD 6.93 %, 2.23 % and 1.17 %, respectively for 5.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mM of glucose), excellent stability (only 3.98 % loss of its initial activity over 14 days, when stored at 4 degrees C), high anti-interference ability to uric acid, acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid and demonstrated good accuracy in the analysis of pharmaceutical preparations Orsalit Drink and Rehydron Optim and human serum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据