4.7 Article

Recombinant protein production associated growth inhibition results mainly from transcription and not from translation

期刊

MICROBIAL CELL FACTORIES
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01343-y

关键词

Escherichia coli; Recombinant protein production; Metabolic burden; Transcriptional burden

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the FORSYS-Partner program [FKZ 0315285]
  2. German Research Council (DFG) through the Cluster of Excellence Rebirth [EXC62]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Recombinant protein production can be stressful to the host organism. The extent of stress is determined by the specific properties of the recombinant transcript and protein, by the rates of transcription and translation, and by the environmental conditions encountered during the production process. Results The impact of the transcription of the T7-promoter controlled genes encoding human basic fibroblast growth factor (hFGF-2) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) as well as the translation into the recombinant protein on the growth properties of the production host E. coli BL21(DE3) were investigated. This was done by using expression vectors where the promoter region or the ribosome binding site(s) or both were removed. It is shown that already transcription without protein translation imposes a metabolic burden on the host cell. Translation of the transcript into large amounts of a properly folded protein does not show any effect on cell growth in the best case, e.g. high-level production of GFP in Luria-Bertani medium. However, translation appears to contribute to the metabolic burden if it is connected to protein folding associated problems, e.g. inclusion body formation. Conclusion The so-called metabolic burden of recombinant protein production is mainly attributed to transcription but can be enhanced through translation and those processes following translation (e.g. protein folding and degradation, heat-shock responses).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据