4.7 Article

Factors affecting B/Ca ratios in synthetic aragonite

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 437, 期 -, 页码 67-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.007

关键词

Boron; Aragonite; Coral; Proxy; Carbonate

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
  2. NSF [OCE-1338320]
  3. ARC
  4. NSF
  5. Western Australian Premiers Fellowship
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1338320] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of B/Ca ratios in marine carbonates have been suggested to record seawater carbonate chemistry, however experimental calibration of such proxies based on inorganic partitioning remains limited. Here we conducted a series of synthetic aragonite precipitation experiments to evaluate the factors influencing the partitioning of B/Ca between aragonite and seawater. Our results indicate that the B/Ca ratio of synthetic aragonites depends primarily on the relative concentrations of borate and carbonate ions in the solution from which the aragonite precipitates; not on bicarbonate concentration as has been previously suggested. The influence of temperature was not significant over the range investigated (20-40 degrees C), however, partitioning may be influenced by saturation state (and/or growth rate). Based on our experimental results, we suggest that aragonite B/Ca ratios can be utilized as a proxy of [CO32-]. Boron isotopic composition (delta B-11) is an established pH proxy, thus B/Ca and delta B-11 together allow the full carbonate chemistry of the solution from which the aragonite precipitated to be calculated. To the extent that aragonite precipitation by marine organisms is affected by seawater chemistry, B/Ca may also prove useful in reconstructing seawater chemistry. A simplified boron purification protocol based on amberlite resin and the organic buffer TRIS is also described. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据