4.5 Article

Notch-Hes1 Signaling Regulates IL-17A+γδ+T Cell Expression and IL-17A Secretion of Mouse Psoriasis-Like Skin Inflammation

期刊

MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION
卷 2020, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8297134

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803145]
  2. Project of Medical and Health Technology Development Program in Shandong Provine [2016WS0045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To evaluate the regulating effect of Notch-Hes1 signaling on IL-17A(+)gamma delta T+ cell expression and IL-17A secretion in mouse psoriasis-like skin inflammation. Materials and Methods. Experimental mice were randomly divided into control group, model group (5% imiquimod- (IMQ-) treated mice), and intervention group (IMQ and gamma-secretase inhibitor DAPT cotreated mice). The severity of psoriasis-like skin inflammation was evaluated by target lesion score based on the clinical psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Flow cytometry detected IL-17A(+)gamma delta T+ cell percentage. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detected Hes1 mRNA expression. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot measured IL-17A serum concentration and protein expression. Additionally, splenic single cells from model mice were treated by DAPT to further evaluate the inhibitory effect of blocking Notch-Hes1 signaling on IL-17A(+)gamma delta T+ cell differentiation and IL-17A secretion. Results. The spleen index, IL-17A(+)gamma delta T+ cell percentage, Hes1 mRNA expression, IL-17A serum concentration, and protein expression were all significantly higher in model mice than control mice, while dramatically reduced in intervention mice by DAPT treatment, which also obviously alleviated the target lesion score, epidermal hyperplasia, and dermal inflammatory cell infiltration of intervention mice. In vitro study demonstrated that DAPT treatment could result in dose-dependent decrease of IL-17A(+)gamma delta T+ cell percentage and IL-17A secretion in splenic single cells of model mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据