4.6 Article

Investigation of residual stress and optimization of welding process parameters to decrease tensile residual stress in the flash butt welded UIC60 rail

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15397734.2020.1756845

关键词

Butt weld; residual stress; phase transformation; optimization; imperialist competitive algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, numerical simulation is used to determine the residual stress of the flash butt joint in the UIC60 rail. The influence of phase transformation is considered to accurately predict critical locations of tensile residual stress. The most effective parameters of the flash butt welding process are optimized to reduce critical tensile residual stresses in the weldment, aiming to minimize the possibility of failure in the welded rail.
In this task, a numerical study is utilized to determine the residual stress of the flash butt joint in the UIC60 rail. To accurately predict critical locations of tensile residual stress, the influence of phase transformation is considered in the simulation. To reduce the possibility of failure in the welded rail, the most effective parameters of the flash butt welding during and after the process are optimized to decrease critical tensile residual stresses in the weldment. To this end, a coupled procedure by considering the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) in Matlab and process modeling in the Python code of Abaqus software is performed. In this procedure, time duration and heat input at each step and upsetting force are considered as welding machine parameters, and the cooling rate is assumed as post welding factor. Using the effectiveness of the ICA method, in nonlinear and huge multi parameters and steps problems, the optimum values of considered factors in terms of reducing the tensile residual stress in butt joint are obtained. The optimum values and effectiveness of each controlling parameter on the maximum and the pattern of tensile residual stress to diminish the failure of the butt welded rail under service loads are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据