4.7 Article

A new data-driven transferable remaining useful life prediction approach for bearing under different working conditions

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106602

关键词

Transfer learning; Hidden Markov model; Remaining useful life estimation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation
  2. Sembcorp Industries Ltd
  3. National University of Singapore under the Sembcorp NUS Corporate Laboratory [R-261-513-003-281]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remaining useful life (RUL) estimation plays a pivotal role in ensuring the safety of a machine, which can further reduce the cost by unwanted downtime or failures. A variety of data-driven methods based on artificial intelligence have been proposed to predict RUL of key component such as bearing. However, many existing approaches have the following two shortcomings: 1) the fault occurrence time (FOT) is ignored or selected subjectively; 2) the training and testing data follow the same data distribution. Inappropriate FOT will either include unrelated information such as noise or reduce critical degradation information. The prognostic model trained with dataset in one working condition can not generalize well on dataset from another different working condition owing to distribution discrepancy. In this paper, to handle these two shortcomings, hidden Markov model (HMM) is first employed to automatically detect state change so that FOT can be located. Then a novel transfer learning method based on multiple layer perceptron (MLP) is presented to solve distribution discrepancy problem. Experiment study on RUL estimation of bearing is analyzed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework can detect FOT adaptively, at the same time provide reliable transferable prognostics performance under different working conditions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据