4.3 Article

Layer-by-layer immobilizing of polydopamine-assisted ε-polylysine and gum Arabic on titanium: Tailoring of antibacterial and osteogenic properties

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110690

关键词

Titanium; epsilon-Polylysine; Layer-by-layer; Antibacteria; Osteogenesis

资金

  1. State Key Project of Research and Development [2016YFC1100300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773199, 51571169, 21621091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial infection has become a crucial reason that give rise to failure of medical implants in clinical applications. In this regard, various antibacterial surface modifications of implants have been developed in recent years. However, it remains a challenge to enable the implant surfaces with both suitable antibacterial and osteogenic properties. In this work, epsilon-polylysine and gum Arabic multilayer composite films were immobilized layer by layer (LBL) on anodized titanium with the assistance of polydopamine for the first time. In vitro anti-bacterial results showed that the bacteria numbers decreased with an increase in the loading amount of epsilon-polylysine. Furthermore, long-term antibacterial property up to 3 weeks against both gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) was obtained combined with the merits of covalent binding and LBL methods. Meanwhile, the cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on titanium dioxide nanotubes (TNTs) modified with composite films was significantly improved. Remarkably, a facile method to optimize anti-infective and osteogenic properties of medical titanium has been developed, and it was demonstrated that the epsilon-polylysine and gum Arabic multilayer composite films with assistance of polydopamine were able to endow the orthopedic implant materials both improved antibacterial property and excellent biocompatibility, which is of profound significance for practical application of titanium-based implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据