4.6 Article

Structural, optical and electrical investigation of sodium phosphate glasses doped MoO3 for high power visible laser safety

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123237

关键词

Meyer-Neldel rule; Laser safety; High-power visible laser; Molybdenum phosphate glasses; Ionic and polaronic conduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphate glasses with the chemical composition of 47P(2)O(5)-24ZnO-(29-x)N2O-xMoO(3), x = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mol%, has been prepared using the melt quenching technique. The amorphous nature of these glasses is confirmed using XRD spectra. The density and molar volume of all glasses are experimentally measured and theoretically calculated. The influence of the replacement of MoO3 with Na2O on the FTIR spectroscopy of the investigated glasses is studied. The FTIR investigation reveals that in the glasses with x = 4, 6 and 8 mol%, the absorption band 1260 cm(-1) related to the Q(2) phosphate structural units is more sensitive to sodium cations than molybdenum cations. In the same region, x = 4-8 mol%, the temperature dependence of the de conductivity of these glasses deviates from the Arrhenius law and obey the Meyer-Neldel Rule. The optical transmission spectra, measured in the wavelength range from 200 to 2500 nm, reveal that the glasses containing MoO3 greater than 4 mol% are suitable for shielding the radiation of the high power lasers operating in the visible region and, in turn, verifying the safety from these lasers. The de conductivity of the investigated glasses is found to be a combination of two contributions: ionic conduction that is due to the movement of the mobile sodium ions and electronic conduction that is due to the electron hopping between molybdenum ions. The increase of the molar volume with increasing MoO3 content makes the ionic contribution to the conduction process more effective because of the enhancement of the mobility of sodium ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据