4.6 Article

Ceramics based on the Sm2O3-Y2O3 and Sm2O3-HfO2 systems at high temperatures: Thermodynamics and modeling

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123240

关键词

Ceramics; Thermodynamics; Phase equilibria; Lanthanides; Rare earths

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-03-00721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceramics based on the Sm2O3-Y2O3 and Sm2O3-HfO2 systems is promising for development of advanced refractory materials including casting molds for gas turbine engine blades and thermal barrier coatings. Vaporization processes and thermodynamic properties of the Sm2O3-Y2O3 and Sm2O3-HfO2 systems were studied by the Knudsen effusion mass spectrometric method. The samples used in the present study were synthesized by the solid-state method. Composition of the vapor over these systems at the temperature 2373 K was the same as over pure oxides. Temperature dependences of the partial pressures of the SmO and Sm vapor species were obtained over pure Sm2O3 in the temperature range 2265-2668 K and over Sm2Hf2O7 in the temperature range 2222-2650 K. The partial pressures of the vapor species, the component activities, and the excess Gibbs energies were determined over a wide concentration ranges in the Sm2O3-Y2O3 and Sm2O3-HfO2 systems at the temperature 2373 K. These thermodynamic functions exhibited negative deviations from the ideality and were compared with the data available for the La2O3-Y2O3, Gd2O3-Y2O3, ZrO2-Y2O3 and La2O3-HfO2, Gd2O3-HfO2, Nd2O3-HfO2 systems. Thermodynamic properties of these binary systems containing yttria and hafnia with rare earth oxides were discussed in the frame of the Generalized Lattice Theory of Associated Solutions. Correlations were found between the observed changes in the thermodynamic behavior of the systems mentioned and the relative number of bonds in the condensed phases when the second coordination sphere was taken into consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据