4.7 Article

Effect of post-heat treatment on the thermophysical and compressive mechanical properties of Cu-Ni-Sn alloy manufactured by selective laser melting

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110194

关键词

Selective laser melting; High thermal conductivity; Cu-Ni-Sn; Heat-treatment; Microstructure; High-temperature; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) - Korea Government (MOTIE) [P0002007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of heat treatment on the microstructure, room- and high-temperature mechanical properties, and thermal properties of selective laser melted Cu-Ni-Sn alloy. Initial microstructural observation confirmed that the as-fabricated sample was composed of Cu, Cu6Sn5, Cu3P and undissolved Ni phases, and then the heat-treated sample was composed of Cu-Ni solid solution, (Cu, Ni)(3)Sn and (Cu, Ni)(3)P. Room- and high-temperature compression tests (25 degrees C similar to 500 degrees C) were performed, and the yield strengths at room temperature measured 230.4 MPa and 346.0 MPa for as-fabricated and heat-treated materials, which indicates an approximately 50% increase in strength after heat treatment. Furthermore, as temperature increased, a phenomenon where the yield strength inverts occurred for both materials, and the cause of such a phenomenon was identified to be due to the difference in strengthening mechanisms. Thermal diffusivity is lower in heat-treated sample at all temperatures, but on the other hand, thermal conductivity interestingly is higher in heat-treated sample than as-fabricated sample (As-fabricated sample: 30.7-44.0 W/m.K, heat-treated sample: 32.8-49.6 W/m.K). The reason for this is identified to be due to microstructure evolution and defect control after heat treatment. Correlations between initial microstructures and mechanical- and thermophysical-properties were also discussed based on these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据