4.2 Article

Sea-ice edge is more important than closer open water access for foraging Adelie penguins: evidence from two colonies

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 640, 期 -, 页码 215-230

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps13289

关键词

Pygoscelis adeliae; Incubation trip; Sea-ice edge; Colony; Diet; GPS; Stable isotopes

资金

  1. IPEV [1091]
  2. WWF-UK
  3. Zone Atelier Antarctique et Subantarctique -LTER France of the CNRS
  4. Terre Australes et Antarctiques Francaises (TAAF)
  5. BNP Paribas Foundation
  6. IUF (Institut Universitaire de France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sentinel species, like Adelie penguins, have been used to assess the impact of environmental changes, and their link with sea ice has received considerable attention. Here, we tested if foraging Adelie penguins from 2 colonies in East Antarctica target the distant sea-ice edge or take advantage of closer open waters that are readily available near their colony. We examined the foraging behaviour of penguins during the incubation trips of females in 2016 and males in 2017, using GPS tracking and diet data in view of daily sea-ice data and bathymetry. In 2016-2017, sea-ice cover was extensive during females' trips but flaw leads and polynyas were close to both study sites. Sea ice receded rapidly during males' trips in 2017-2018. Despite close open water near both colonies in both years, females and males preferentially targeted the continental slope and the sea-ice edge to forage. In addition, there was no difference in the diet of penguins from both colonies: all penguins fed mostly on Antarctic hill and males also foraged on Antarctic silverfish. Our results highlight the importance of the sea-ice edge for penguins, an area where food abundance is predictable. It is likely that resource availability was not sufficient in closer open water areas at such an early stage in the breeding season. The behaviours displayed by the penguins from both colonies were similar, suggesting a common behaviour across colonies in Terre Adelie, although additional sites would be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据