4.7 Article

Sr and Nd isotopes of cold seep carbonates from the northern South China sea as proxies for fluid sources

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104284

关键词

Cold seep carbonates; South China sea; Sr isotopes; Nd isotopes; Fluid-tracking

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Gas Hydrate, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y909k11001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41873011]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017B16214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Sr isotopes combined with Nd isotopes of modern cold seep carbonates were studied to provide reliable proxies for sources and pathways of seep fluids. We presented Sr and Nd isotopes together with stable carbon and oxygen isotope data of cold seep carbonates recovered from the northern continental slope of the South China Sea (SCS). Based on the evidence for negligible detrital contamination and diagenetic alteration, carbonate samples are considered dependable archives which record Sr and Nd isotope signals of the original pore waters from which carbonates have precipitated. Excellent correlation between Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios and 1/Sr observed in carbonate samples indicates two end-members with distinct Sr isotopic signatures, including modern seawater as a major source and a lesser contribution from methane-rich seep fluid driven from a deep source. Besides these two end-members, release of Nd from organic matter and Fe-Mn oxyhydroxide is an additional contribution to pore water Nd. Furthermore, Sr and Nd isotopic compositions suggest water-rock interactions between upward seep fluid and detrital component in sediments, which resulted in the isotopic shift towards pronounced Nd-143 depleted and slightly Sr-87 enriched in the fluid phase. This study provides insight into the knowledge for tracing seepage fluid circulation by Sr-Nd isotope system at modern seep systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据