4.5 Article

Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 2231-2245

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28269

关键词

4D-flow MRI; blood flow; computational fluid dynamics; simulation-based imaging

资金

  1. Crafoordska Stiftelsen (The Crafoord Foundation)
  2. Luis W. Alvarez Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Hjart-Lungfonden (Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation) [20170554]
  5. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Vetenskapsradet (Swedish Research Council) [2016-01617, 2018-03721]
  7. Swedish strategic e-science research program eSSENCE
  8. Swedish Research Council [2018-03721, 2016-01617] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  9. Vinnova [2018-03721, 2016-01617] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Three-dimensional, time-resolved blood flow measurement (4D-flow) is a powerful research and clinical tool, but improved resolution and scan times are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) present a postprocessing framework for optimization-driven simulation-based flow imaging, called4D-flow High-resolution Imaging with a priori Knowledge Incorporating the Navier-Stokes equations and the discontinuous Galerkin method(4D-flow HIKING), (2) investigate the framework in synthetic tests, (3) perform phantom validation using laser particle imaging velocimetry, and (4) demonstrate the use of the framework in vivo. Methods An optimizing computational fluid dynamics solver including adjoint-based optimization was developed to fit computational fluid dynamics solutions to 4D-flow data. Synthetic tests were performed in 2D, and phantom validation was performed with pulsatile flow. Reference velocity data were acquired using particle imaging velocimetry, and 4D-flow data were acquired at 1.5 T. In vivo testing was performed on intracranial arteries in a healthy volunteer at 7 T, with 2D flow as the reference. Results Synthetic tests showed low error (0.4%-0.7%). Phantom validation showed improved agreement with laser particle imaging velocimetry compared with input 4D-flow in the horizontal (mean -0.05 vs -1.11 cm/s,P< .001; SD 1.86 vs 4.26 cm/s,P< .001) and vertical directions (mean 0.05 vs -0.04 cm/s,P= .29; SD 1.36 vs 3.95 cm/s,P< .001). In vivo data show a reduction in flow rate error from 14% to 3.5%. Conclusions Phantom and in vivo results from 4D-flow HIKING show promise for future applications with higher resolution, shorter scan times, and accurate quantification of physiological parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据