4.6 Article

Optimized polybutylene terephthalate powders for selective laser beam melting

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.09.009

关键词

Poly butylene terephthalate; Wet grinding; Downer reactor; Dry particle coating; Flowability; Selective laser beam melting

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [CRC814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Additive manufacturing processes like selective laser beam melting of polymers (LBM) are established for production of prototypes and individualized parts. The transfer to serial production currently is hindered by the limited availability of polymer powders with good processability. Within this contribution the effect of powder properties, such as particle size, shape and flowability on the processability in LBM and their influence on device quality is exemplified for polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) materials. A process chain for the production of spherical polymer microparticles has been developed to obtain PBT powder materials. The process chain consists of three steps: first, polymer microparticles are produced by wet grinding. Second, the particle shape is engineered by rounding in a heated downer reactor to improve the flowability of the product. Third, a further improvement of flowability of the still cohesive spherical PBT particles is realized by dry coating with fumed silica. Moreover, properties of the PBT powders obtained along the process chain are thoroughly characterized with respect to structure and crystallinity by infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. The effect of flowability, shape and bulk density on the powders' process-abilities in LBM is assessed by characterization of the quality of thin layers built in a LBM device. It is demonstrated that the device quality is strongly determined by particle properties: powders of good flowability and high bulk density are mandatory to obtain dense devices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据