4.4 Article

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry Assisted Preparation of Polysiloxane Main-Chain Liquid-Crystalline Elastomers

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 221, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.202000071

关键词

acoustic cavitation; hydrosilylation polyaddition; liquid-crystalline elastomers; smart polymers; ultrasonics sonochemistry

资金

  1. Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Cosmetics (Beijing Technology and Business University) China National Light Industry [KLC-2018-ZD2]
  2. Innovation Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education, P. R. China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the first time, an ultrasonics sonochemistry method is developed to promote the one-pot hydrosilylation polyaddition polymerization and crosslinking reaction in the preparation of polysiloxane main-chain liquid-crystalline elastomers (MC-LCEs). Due to the extraordinary effect of acoustic cavitation, the polyaddition polymerization and crosslinking reaction can be successfully carried out in an ordinary laboratory ultrasonic cleaner at room temperature, and generates the LCE matrix network in about 30 min. The prepared MC-LCEs demonstrate good quality, good properties, and stimuli-actuation performances. Compared to the traditional thermal processing methods for preparing polysiloxane MC-LCEs, this method exhibits superior properties rapidly, with high convenience and efficiency, and can be a path for batch fabrication at low cost. The work also demonstrates that the ultrasonics sonochemistry method is effective in generating linear main-chain liquid crystal polymers through hydrosilylation polyaddition and polysiloxane side-chain LCE matrix through hydrosilylation crosslinking reaction, thus confirming the high availability of ultrasonics sonochemistry in the processes of hydrosilylation polymerization, crosslinking reactions, or synchronous polymerization and crosslinking reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据