4.6 Article

Cost evaluation of antibody production processes in different operation modes

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 63-74

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.10.029

关键词

Continuous processing; Antibodies; Bioprocess engineering; Cost evaluation; Platform process

资金

  1. European Union (European Regional Development Fund)
  2. German Federal State North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) [005-1010-0009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An increasing market pressure through biosimilars and other factors lead to the necessity of economic process mode evaluations of antibody production processes. This work compares a fed-batch and a continuously operated platform process based on a cost of goods (CoG) calculation. For a production capacity of 200 kg(ApI)/a the comparison reveals great differences between the upstream and downstream CoG of both process modes. Whereas the fed-batch process has total specific CoG of 59 (sic)/g(mAb), the continuously operated process results in 84 (sic)/g(mAb), which is mainly caused by the expensive upstream part. Due to a high consumption of perfusion fermentation medium, the continuously operated upstream is about 33 (sic)/g(mAb) more expensive compared to the fed-batch upstream. Contrary to the upstream part, the continuously operated downstream is about 8 (sic)/g(mAb) cheaper than the downstream of the batch process. This difference is mainly caused by a better utilization of chromatography resins in the continuously operated downstream. As a result of this comparison, a third process mode is evaluated: the hybrid process. The hybrid process combines the beneficial parts of both process modes, i.e. a fed-batch upstream is combined with a continuously operated downstream. Compared to the fed-batch process, the hybrid process results in total specific CoG of 50(sic)/g(mAb) for a production capacity of 200 kg(ApI)/a, which corresponds with a reduction in CoG by 15%. Variation of the production capacity from 50 to 1000 kg(ApI)/a confirms the superiority of the hybrid process compared to the two alternative process modes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据