4.6 Article

A soluble endoplasmic reticulum factor as regenerative therapy for Wolfram syndrome

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 100, 期 9, 页码 1197-1207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41374-020-0436-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
  2. National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK112921, DK020579]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the NIH [TR002065, TR000448]
  4. Washington University Diabetes Research Center - NIDDK of the NIH
  5. Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation
  6. JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships
  7. NIH [F30DK111070]
  8. Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences from the NCATS of the NIH [UL1TR002345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated cell death is an emerging target for human chronic disorders, including neurodegeneration and diabetes. However, there is currently no treatment for preventing ER stress-mediated cell death. Here, we show that mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF), a neurotrophic factor secreted from ER stressed cells, prevents ER stress-mediated beta cell death and enhances beta cell proliferation in cell and mouse models of Wolfram syndrome, a prototype of ER disorders. Our results indicate that molecular pathways regulated by MANF are promising therapeutic targets for regenerative therapy of ER stress-related disorders, including diabetes, retinal degeneration, neurodegeneration, and Wolfram syndrome. Wolfram syndrome is a prototype of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress disorder characterized by diabetes, visual impairment, and neurodegeneration. Currently, there is no treatment that can halt or reverse the disease progression. Here, the authors show that mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor-based regenerative gene therapy is an emerging therapeutic strategy for Wolfram syndrome and other ER stress-related disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据