4.7 Article

Study of the effects of ionic liquid-modified cathodes and ceramic separators on MFC performance

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 317-324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.084

关键词

Ceramic separators; Microbial Fuel Cell; Ionic liquid; Activated carbon cathodes; Activated sludge

资金

  1. Polytechnic University of Cartagena [PMPDI-UPCT-2015]
  2. Ministry of Education [FPU12/05444]
  3. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BES-2012-055350]
  4. EPSRC New Directions award [EP/L002132/1]
  5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1094890]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L002132/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/L002132/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceramic-based MFC designs have proven to be a low cost alternative for power production and wastewater treatment. The use of ionic liquids in ceramic MFCs is explored for the first time in the present work in order to improve power output. The ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifiuoromethyl sulfonyl)imide, [EMIM][Tf2N], has been selected for this purpose due to its advantageous properties. The performance of activated carbon cathodes using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) binder and different carbon diffusion layers (DL) (controls) is compared with two types of ionic liquid-modified cathodes (test). This work continues to study the performance of terracotta separators modified with the same ionic liquid, neat and also mixed with PTFE. Whilst the results show operational limitations when the IL is integrated in the ceramic separator, there is a significant enhancement of the MFC performance when added as part of the activated layer mixture of the cathode, achieving up to 86.5% more power output in comparison with IL-free MFCs (from 229.78 mu W to 428.65 mu W). The addition of a layer of PTFE-mixed ionic liquid spread on the activated layer of the cathode also leads to an increase in power of approximately 37%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据