4.7 Article

Stochastic bubble developing model combined with Markov process of particles for bubbling fluidized beds

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 206-214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.095

关键词

Stochastic model; Markov chain; Bubbling fluidized bed; CFD-DEM

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51276036, 51306035]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYLX_0114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a new stochastic model for simulating particle movement in bubbling fluidized beds (BFB). The model includes a stochastic bubble developing model (SBDM) and a Markov chain based stochastic model (MCM) of particles, while current single MCM for BFB cannot afford detailed flow structure of gas and solid for further chemical reaction modeling. The bubble generating, moving and growing sub-models of SBDM are detailed introduced. SBDM is coupled with MCM by a bubble shaping sub model. Stochastic methods and some empirical models are used in the modeling process. Samples used by the stochastic model are taken from a CFD-DEM result. Four representative cases that have different fluidized air velocities are simulated. Particle distribution and mixing calculated by CFD-DEM, MCM and SBDM-MCM are compared. Results show both MCM and SBDM-MCM can approximately reduce the computing time by 70 times compared with CFD-DEM, and they can also keep the macroscopic characteristic of particle movement well from CFD-DEM. But MCM always shows a time-averaged result, and it cannot present the structure and disturbance of bubbles. While SBDM-MCM successfully simulates the development of bubbles and introduces their instantaneous disturbance to the movement of particles. Compared with MCM, the remarkable improvement of SBDM-MCM is that it can give the recurrence of bubble structure in particle distribution and the pulsating characteristics of particle mixing curves. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据