4.7 Review

Management and valorization of aluminum saline slags: Current status and future trends

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 74-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.069

关键词

Aluminum saline slag; Industrial waste valorization; Nonmetallic products; High-value-added product

资金

  1. Seventh Framework Programme through project RecycAl

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current situation as regards the management and valorization of aluminum saline slags, also known as aluminum salt cake or salt slag, is reviewed in this work. Aluminum saline slags are produced by the secondary aluminum industry and formed during the aluminum scrap/dross melting processes. The amount of saline slag generated in these operations can vary between 30% and 60% of the metal produced, that is, between 300 and 600 kg per ton of aluminum produced. This waste contains about 3-9 wt.% metallic aluminum, 20-50 wt.% oxides, such as aluminum oxide (also referred to as nonmetallic products), 20-75 wt.% flux brines, and other components in smaller proportions. Due to their composition and possible reaction with water, saline slags are classified as hazardous waste and are included in the European List of Wastes, which means that they must be deposited in landfills or in secure deposits. Similarly, salt cake is a byproduct which could be recovered provided the process is economically viable. Direct applications such as inert filling for construction, road paving, morter components, aluminum salts, inert filler in polymer composites, adsorbents, mineral wood, have been reported. Aluminum, by chemical dissolution from the nonmetallic fraction, can also be recovered as a high-value-added product and used to synthesize materials such as pure alumina, salts, and hydroxides. This work reviews current methods for treating saline slags, with a primary focus on the synthesis of products from the nonmetallic fraction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据