4.7 Article

Well-dispersed nebula-like ZnO/CeO2@HNTs heterostructure for efficient photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 304, 期 -, 页码 917-933

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.014

关键词

ZnO; CeO2; Heterostructure; HNTs; Tetracycline; Wet-calcination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576125]
  2. China's Post-doctoral Science Fund [2015M570416]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20140532, BK20151349, BK20150484]
  4. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University, China [14JDG148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of nebula-like ZnO/CeO2@HNTs heterostructure photocatalysts were synthesized via a novel onestep wet-calcination method for degradation of tetracycline (TC) under simulated solar irradiation. TEM, HRTEM, XRD, FT-IR, XPS, DRS, PL, PC, EIS and ESR techniques were applied for characterization of samples. And the potential structure of new photodegradation products was studied by HPLC-MS analysis. The characterization results revealed the enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CeO2@HNTs heterostructure photocatalysts due to the delayed recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Moreover, surface oxidation state analysis demonstrates that Ce3+ and Ce4+ states coexist in CeO2, which enhance the separation of electron-hole pairs though cerium oxide shifting between Ceo(2) and Ce2O3 under photocatalytic process. In addition, the effects of the calcinating temperature, the molar ratio of ZnO to CeO2 and the dosage of HNTs on photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CeO2@HNTs heterostructure photocatalysts were researched and the best possible values have been found. Furthermore, the photodegradation mechanism was systematically investigated by active species trapping experiment. It revealed that center dot OH radicals play a little role while hole and O-center dot(2)- are the more major reactive species in the photodegradation process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据