4.7 Article

Impact of third-grade nanofluid flow across a convective surface in the presence of inclined Lorentz force: an approach to entropy optimization

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 144, 期 5, 页码 1935-1947

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09751-3

关键词

Entropy generation; 3rd-grade nanofluid; Inclined magnetic field; Thermal radiation; Cattaneo-Christov heat flux (CCHF) model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized the CCHF model for heat transfer and entropy generation analysis, with consideration of different flow constants impact on fluid friction, heat, and mass transfer. Nonlinear PDE were simplified into a set of nonlinear ODE systems using similarity transformations, and the influence of flow constants on velocity, entropy generation, and temperature profiles were discussed.
The current article deals with heat transfer and entropy generation analysis using Cattaneo-Christov heat flux (CCHF) for a flow of third grade nanofluid toward stretchable sheet with inclined magnetic field effects. Thermal radiation, heat generation/absorption, and convective heating effects are considered. Further entropy generation for fluid friction with inclined magnetic field, heat and mass transfer is calculated. This research is specially investigated for the impact of radiation effects using the CCHF model with entropy generation subject to distinct flow constants. Similarity transformations are used to reduce nonlinear PDE to a set of nonlinear ODE systems. The impact of suitable flow constants on the velocity, entropy generation, Bejan number, concentration, and temperature profiles are discussed. The coefficient of mass gradient and temperature gradient is calculated. Entropy generation and Bejan number profiles show the reverse effect on the larger thermal relaxation time parameter. Moreover, entropy of the system is found to be improving with the radiation constant, Biot number, suction/injection constant, Hartmann number and Brinkman number.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据