4.7 Article

Experimental study of the effect of disk obstacle rotating with Different angular ratios on heat transfer and pressure drop in a pipe with turbulent flow

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 1401-1416

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09653-4

关键词

Thermal performance coefficient; Obstacle rotating; Turbulent flow; Heat exchanger

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of rotating disk obstacles with different angle ratios on heat transfer and pressure drop in a water-air type shell and tube heat exchanger. The results indicated that rotating obstacles showed lower pressure drop and improved thermal performance compared to fixed obstacles.
This article presents the effects of a circular disk obstacle with different angle ratios on heat transfer and pressure drop under a turbulent flow inside the tube with a constant temperature wall. Remarkable investigations have suggested the use of various obstacles for heat transfer enhancement in heat exchangers. The used geometry for almost all studies has been fixed obstacles. However, the use of the rotary obstacle is an innovative issue to the author's best knowledge. The obstacle rotation influences heat transfer rate through the effective displacement of the fluid particles. Thus, this investigation studies the effect of disk obstacle rotation from 50 to 200 rpm at different angle ratios and pitch ratios 1 and 2 on heat transfer and pressure drop in shell and tube heat exchanger of water-air type in the Reynolds number between 10,000 and 25,000. The results showed that rotating obstacles have less pressure drop than that of the fixed obstacle under similar shape and configuration. Compared to the smooth pipe, the Nusselt number, friction coefficient, and thermal performance coefficient increased by 300%, 69.38%, and 131%, respectively. The maximum heat performance coefficient 1.62 times relative to the fixed obstacle in similar condition was recorded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据