4.7 Article

Experimental investigation and optimization of loop heat pipe performance with nanofluids

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 1435-1449

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09641-8

关键词

Loop heat pipe; Nanofluid; Optimization; Thermal enhancement; Optimization; Design of experiment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the thermal performance of loop heat pipes using different types of nanofluids, finding that the thermal resistance decreased with increasing mass concentration for diamond and Al2O3 nanofluids, while SiO2 nanofluid showed the opposite trend. Diamond nanofluid exhibited the lowest thermal resistance and better heat capacity and enhancement compared to Al2O3.
High heat generation from electronic devices needs to cool down properly to prevent overheating. Loop heat pipe (LHP) is one of the excellent cooling devices for high heat generation of electronic devices. Nanofluid is a working fluid which has nanoparticle dispersed in based fluid. Nanofluid is proven to have better thermal performance compared with conventional fluids. In this paper, we investigate on the thermal performance of loop heat pipes using different types of nanofluids. The desired nanofluids used in this study are diamond nanofluid, aluminium oxide (Al2O3) nanofluid and silica oxide nanofluid (SiO2) with 0-3% of mass concentrations. The results showed that as the mass concentration of nanofluids increased, the thermal resistance for diamond nanofluid and Al2O3 nanofluid decreased, but SiO2 nanofluid results show the opposite trend of thermal resistance with increasing mass concentration. The lowest thermal resistance is 3.0872 degrees C W-1, 3.1465 degrees C W-1 and 3.2816 degrees C W-1 for diamond, Al2O3 and SiO2, respectively. Moreover, all types of nanofluids show better heat transfer performance compared with water. Diamond nanofluid also had higher heat capacity than Al2O3 nanofluid as it had a lower vapour line temperature reading. Optimization result also shows that diamond nanofluid has better thermal enhancement than Al2O3 with 1.19% of mass concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据