4.5 Article

Supplier selection and evaluation in the garment supply chain: an integrated DEA-PCA-VIKOR approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE
卷 112, 期 4, 页码 578-595

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2020.1768771

关键词

Garment supply chain; supplier performance evaluation; principal component analysis; data reduction; relative efficiency; mathematical programming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the importance of purchasing decisions in business policy, with a focus on the impact of raw material suppliers on product quality and popularity in the garment supply chain. Through quantitative and qualitative decision-making criteria, as well as a three-step integrated approach, suppliers can be systematically evaluated and selected.
Purchasing decisions are playing a key role in business policy. In this regard, product qualities and popularities, company's reputation and enhancing quick-response are highly dependent on the raw material suppliers' performance. In garment supply chain, these decisions are based on competitive goals to provide the most customer satisfaction. In this article, quantitative and qualitative decision-making criteria are comprehensively developed to enable the logistician to systematically evaluate and select the suppliers. Then, a three-step integrated approach is proposed to deal with the supplier selection and evaluation problem in the garment industry. In the first phase, the criteria are reduced by maintaining the maximum information and adoption of principal component analysis. In the second phase, the additive model of data envelopment analysis is enhanced by the resultant principal components to determine the efficient suppliers. Finally, the third phase is concerned with ranking of efficient suppliers through Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method as a compromise ranking approach. A numerical study in a garment supply chain is conducted to show the applicability and utility of the model development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据