4.2 Article

Cold intolerance and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury in upper extremity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 184-190

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jns.12376

关键词

cold intolerance; nerve repair; neuropathic pain; peripheral nerve injury; sensory re-education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold intolerance and pain can be a substantial problem in patients with peripheral nerve injury. We aimed at investigating the relationships among sensory recovery, cold intolerance, and neuropathic pain in patients affected by upper limb peripheral nerve injury (Sunderland type V) treated with microsurgical repair, followed by early sensory re-education. In a cross-sectional clinical study, 100 patients (male/female 81/19; age 40.5 +/- 14.8 years and follow-up 17 +/- 5 months, mean +/- SD), with microsurgical nerve repair and reconstruction in the upper extremity and subsequent early sensory re-education, were evaluated, using Cold Intolerance Symptoms Severity questionnaire-Italian version (CISS-it, cut-off pathology >30/100 points), CISS questionnaire-12 item version (CISS-12, 0-46 points-grouping: healthy that means no cold intolerance [0-14], mild [15-24], moderate [25-34], severe [35-42], very severe [43-46] cold intolerance), probability of neuropathic pain (DouleurNeuropathique-4; [DN4] 4/10), deep and superficial sensibility, tactile threshold (monofilaments), and two-point discrimination (cutoff S2; Medical Research Council scale for sensory function; [MRC-scale]). A high CISS score is associated with possible neuropathic pain (DN4 >= 4). Both a low CISS-it score (ie, < 30) and DN4 < 4 is associated with good sensory recovery (MRC >= 2). In conclusion patients affected by upper limb peripheral nerve injuries with higher CISS scores more often suffer from cold intolerance and neuropathic pain, and the better their sensory recovery is, the less likely they are to suffer from cold intolerance and neuropathic pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据