4.6 Article

In vitro comparison of 3D printed polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite and polylactic acid/bioglass composite scaffolds: Insights into materials for bone regeneration

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103641

关键词

Bone regeneration; 3D printing; Polylactic acid; Hydroxyapatite; Bioglass

资金

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [MIP - 046/2015]
  2. L'OREAL Baltic For Women in Science fellowship
  3. Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
  4. Development of nanostructured bone substitute materials and study of immunological aspects in bone tissue regeneration project [RTU/RSU-17]
  5. Lithuanian National Commission for UNESCO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3D printing of polylactic acid (PLA) and hydroxyapatite (HA) or bioglass (BG) bioceramics composites is the most promising technique for artificial bone construction. However, HA and BG have different chemical composition as well as different bone regeneration inducing mechanisms. Thus, it is important to compare differentiation processes induced by 3D printed PLA + HA and PLA + BG scaffolds in order to evaluate the strongest osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties possessing bioceramics. In this study, we analysed porous PLA + HA (10%) and PLA + BG (10%) composites' effect on rat's dental pulp stem cells fate in vitro. Obtained results indicated, that PLA + BG scaffolds lead to weaker cell adhesion and proliferation than PLA + HA. Nevertheless, osteoinductive and other biofriendly properties were more pronounced by PLA + BG composites. Overall, the results showed a strong advantage of bioceramic BG against HA, thus, 3D printed PLA + BG composite scaffolds could be a perspective component for patient-specific, cheaper and faster artificial bone tissue production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据