4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Original Effect of PAN-based and pitch-based carbon fibres on microstructure and properties of continuous Cf/ZrB2-SiC UHTCMCs

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 3045-3050

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.032

关键词

UHTCMC; Carbon fibres; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Self-Healing

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and innovation programme [685594]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructure and mechanical properties of two different Cf/ZrB2-SiC composites reinforced with continuous PyC coated PAN-derived fibers or uncoated pitch-derived fibers were compared. It was found that coated PAN-derived fibers provided higher strengths and damage tolerance due to a higher degree of fiber pull-out, but also resulted in a less homogeneous microstructure. On the other hand, the weaker fiber/matrix interface in coated bundles led to lower interlaminar shear, off-axis strength, and ablation resistance compared to uncoated pitch-derived fibers.
In this paper the microstructure and mechanical properties of two different Cf/ZrB2-SiC composites reinforced with continuous PyC coated PAN-derived fibres or uncoated pitch-derived fibres were compared. Pitch-derived carbon fibres showed a lower degree of reaction with the matrix phase during sintering compared to PyC/PAN-derived fibres. The reason lies in the different microstructure of the carbon. The presence of a coating for PAN-derived fibres was found to be essential to limit the reaction at the fibre/matrix interface during SPS. However, coated bundles were more difficult to infiltrate, resulting in a less homogeneous microstructure. As far as the mechanical properties are concerned, specimens reinforced with coated PAN-derived fibres provided higher strengths and damage tolerance than uncoated pitch-derived fibres, due to the higher degree of fibre pull-out. On the other hand, the weaker fibre/matrix interface resulted in lower interlaminar shear, off-axis strength and ablation resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据