4.7 Article

The formation of alpha-FeOOH onto hydrothermal biochar through H2O2 and its photocatalytic disinfection

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 202-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.116

关键词

Hydrothermal biochar; Goethite; H2O2; Pathogen; Photocatalytic disinfection

资金

  1. Jiangsu Taihu water pollution prevention and Control Office [TH2013316]
  2. startup foundation for introducing talent of NUIST [2243141501045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effect of H2O2 levels on the formation of alpha-FeOOH (goethite) on the modified hydrothermal biochar and its photocatalytic disinfection performance were investigated in this study. Chemical composition analysis indicated that goethite formed successfully on biochars using hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) with H2O2 modification. The investigation for the relationship of oxygen-rich functional groups with H2O2 levels and Fe (III) mass balance during goethite formation implied that carboxylic group on biochars increased obviously with the increase of H2O2 levels, while both hydroxyl and lactone groups increased firstly and then decreased with increase of H2O2 levels. Fe (III) could approximately meet mass balance during the second HTC. Goethite level on goethite coated biochar (GCB) by 20% H2O2 modification was higher than the one for 30% H2O2 modification due to the potential phase transformation. The application of GCB in photocatalytic disinfection systems showed that Escherichia coli inactivation by GCB photocatalysis (solar or UVA irradiation) was evidently greater than the one by the control. The inactivation of E. coli by GCB4 (20% H2O2 modification) photocatalytic disinfection was the best with close to 4.5 log reduction for solar irradiation and about 4 log reduction for UVA irradiation, which had little changes after five cycle experiments, suggesting that the application of GCB4 photocatalysis with solar or UVA to inactivate E. coli was feasible and desirable in this study. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据