4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on biomass gasification using chemical looping in a batch reactor and a continuous dual reactor

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 689-700

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.008

关键词

Biomass gasification using chemical looping; Lattice oxygen; Natural hematite; Batch reactor and continuous reactor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276037, 51406035, 51476029]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551489]
  3. Foundation of Graduate Creative Program [KYLX15_0065]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass gasification using chemical looping (BGCL) is an innovative biomass gasification technique using lattice oxygen from oxygen carrier. The present work selected natural hematite as oxygen carrier, and experimental results from batch reactor and continuous reactor were compared in this work. The results showed that the presence of hematite would accelerate the process of biomass gasification and enhance carbon conversion rate, and hematite could increase the heat-carrier capacity of bed materials in the continuous reactor. In the batch reactor, carbon conversion efficiency and fraction of CO + H-2 increased within the temperature range of 750-900 degrees C. However, syngas yield in the continuous reactor reached the maximum of 0.64 Nm(3) kg(-1) at 850 degrees C. Besides, the effect of hematite fraction on the gasification performance was similar between the batch reactor and the continuous reactor. When hematite fraction was exceed 40 wt.%, higher hematite fraction resulted in higher carbon conversion efficiency and lower syngas production. At last, the phase characterization of reduced hematite was investigated. Fe3O4 were the main reduced phases of hematite in the batch reactor, while FeO might be existed in the continuous reactor. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据