4.7 Article

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in High -Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 75, 期 19, 页码 2403-2413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.008

关键词

aspirin; bleeding; diabetes mellitus; thrombosis; ticagrelor monotherapy

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Amgen
  3. Aralez
  4. Bayer
  5. Biosensors
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. BristolMyers Squibb
  8. Chiesi
  9. Daiichi-Sankyo
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. Janssen
  12. Merck
  13. Sanofi
  14. CeloNova
  15. CSL Behring
  16. Eisai
  17. Gilead
  18. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals
  19. Matsutani Chemical Industry
  20. Novartis
  21. Osprey Medical
  22. RenalGuard Solutions
  23. Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation
  24. Abbott
  25. Boston Scientific
  26. Medtronic
  27. Angel Medical
  28. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  29. Johnson Johnson
  30. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  31. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  32. Corindus
  33. Ancora
  34. CSI
  35. ShockWave
  36. Devax
  37. Infraredx
  38. Pfizer
  39. Zoll
  40. DSI
  41. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  42. OrbusNeich
  43. PLC/RenalGuard
  44. Abbott Vascular

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND P2Y(12) inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor after a brief period of dual antiplatelet therapy can reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic harm after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of this approach among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin among patients with DM undergoing PCI. METHODS This was a pre-specified analysis of the DM cohort in the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial. After 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomized to aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The composite ischemic endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS Patients with DM comprised 37% (n = 2,620) of the randomized cohort and were characterized by more frequent comorbidities and a higher prevalence of multivessel disease. The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was 4.5% and 6.7% among patients with DM randomized to ticagrelor plus placebo versus ticagrelor plus aspirin (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.91; p = 0.012). Ticagrelor monotherapy was not associated with an increase in ischemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin (4.6% vs. 5.9%; hazard ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 1.09; p = 0.14). In the overall trial population, there was no significant interaction between DM status and treatment group for the primary bleeding or ischemic endpoints. CONCLUSIONS Compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy in reducing the risk of clinically relevant bleeding without any increase in ischemic events was consistent among patients with or without DM undergoing PCI. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2403-13) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据