4.7 Article

Removal of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in HSF and VF pilot-scale constructed wetlands

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 146-156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.103

关键词

Constructed wetlands; Horizontal subsurface flow; Vertical flow; Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last decade, several emerging chemicals, also referred as Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs), have raised the interest of the scientific community, because of possible adverse effects on the environment and the living organisms. Although several treatment technologies have been applied for their removal, operation and maintenance costs are prohibitive. Therefore, this study aims to study the treatment of EDCs with an alternative and environmentally friendly technology: constructed wetlands (CWs). For this purpose, 6 pilot-scale CW units of two types, horizontal subsurface flow (HSF) and vertical flow (VF), were used for the treatment of municipal wastewater originating from a university campus, targeting the removal of five EDCs: Bisphenol A (BPA), Nonylphenol (NP), Nonylphenol monoethoxylate (NP1EO), Nonylphenol diethoxylate (NP2EO) and Triclosan (TCS). Results showed that the median removal performance in HSF-R was 49.6%, 51.4% and 48.4%, in HSF-C was 50.0%, 99.0% and 66.0%, and in HSF-Z was 55.4%, 98.9% and 80.3% for BPA, NP1EO and NP2EO, respectively. NP was not removed but its concentration was increased by 48.0%, 43.7% and 51.9% in the HSF-R, HSF-C and HSF-Z, respectively. TCS was not detected in influent wastewater. In the VF-CWs, the median removal efficiencies were: 45.6%, 12.5%, 41.5% and 72.2% in VF-R, 60.0%, 96.2%, 99.0% and 99.8% in VF-C, and 59.0%, 95.6%, 98.7% and 99.8% in VF-Z for BPA, NP, NP1EO, NP2EO, respectively. The study indicates that the main removal pathways of the target EDCs is their biodegradation under aerobic or/and anaerobic conditions and adsorption onto the organic matter retained in the substrate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据