4.7 Article

Mapping the glass forming region and making their phosphor-in-glass for application in W-LEDs packaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 103, 期 9, 页码 5056-5066

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.17278

关键词

glass forming region; gradient refractive index (GRIN); luminous efficacy; phosphor-in-tellurite glass (PiTG); white-light emitting diodes (W-LEDs)

资金

  1. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures of Wuhan University of Technology [SYSJJ2019-14]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372179, 51772224]
  3. program of (CNBM) Bengbu Design & Research Institute for Glass Industry Co., Ltd. [2019KF01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of phosphor-in-glass (PiG) packaging material in white-light emitting diodes (W-LEDs) can improve the thermal stability and luminous efficacy of LED devices. In this work, a low melting point glass of TeO2-ZnO-Na2O-B2O3 (TZNB) was selected as glass matrix, and mixed with YAG: Ce3+ phosphor powders to obtain phosphor-in-tellurite glass (PiTG). In a significant advance, we mapped the glass forming region of TZNB for the first time. This high refractive index glass matrix with low melting temperature was achieved by optimizing the glass composition. The refractive index increased regularly from 1.61 to 2.03, when the dosage of TeO2 increased from 15 to 75 mol%. Through Monte Carlo simulations and numerical calculations, the optimal structure of gradient refractive index (GRIN) was designed, which is consisted of TZNB-1 (n = 2.03), TZNB-4 (n = 1.79), TZNB-6 (n = 1.66), and glass substrate (n = 1.52). The PiTG with GRIN coating was fabricated by screen printing and low-temperature sintering, and the optimized sintering temperature is 575 degrees C. Compared with the single refractive index (SRIN) coating, the luminous efficacy of PiTG with GRIN coating was enhanced from 9.51% to 23.12%. Therefore, this work provides a significant application in high-power W-LEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据