4.7 Article

Fabrication and characterization of Fe/Ni nanoparticles supported by polystyrene resin for trichloroethylene degradation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 730-739

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.076

关键词

Dechlorination; Fe/Ni nanoparticles; Polystyrene resin; Reduction; Trichloroethylene (TCE)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51178117, 51378227]
  2. Key Projects of International Cooperation of Science and Technology of Fujian [2014I0013]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian [2012J05094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Fe, Ni, and Fe/Ni nanoparticles were successfully incorporated in commercial polystyrene cation exchange resin, D072, to form Fe-D072, Ni-D072, and Fe/Ni-D072 composites. The resultant composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectrometer and X-ray diffraction. For the first time, the resultant composites were used to dechlorinate trichloroethylene (TCE), the target pollutant, in aqueous solution. The effects of initial concentration of TCE and solution pH on TCE removal efficiencies by Fe/Ni-D072 were investigated. The stability and durability of Fe/Ni-D072 were also examined. Results showed that Fe/Ni-D072 with 4% wt of Ni/Fe loading (mass ratio: Ni:Fe = 20:80) possesses superior dechlorination performance compared with TCE to Fe-D072 and Ni-D072. The freshly prepared Fe/Ni-D072 exhibited high reactivity during the dechlorination process of TCE. However, reactivity decreased with increased number of cycles. The leaching of Fe and Ni ions from Fe/Ni-D072 were approximately 0.2 ppm and less than 0.1 ppm, respectively, which are below the maximum acceptable level of Fe and Ni in water (0.3 mg/L for Fe and 0.1 mg/L for Ni) as suggested by the US Environment Protection Agency (EPA). The study confirmed that Fe/Ni-D072 is a potential catalyst to reduce environmental pollutants containing carbon halogen bonds such as TCE. (C) O 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据