4.7 Article

Systematic screening and modification of Ni based catalysts for hydrogen generation from supercritical water gasification of lignin

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 1019-1032

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.032

关键词

Ni catalyst; Hydrogen production; Supercritical water (SCN); Lignin; Gasification

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, systematic screening of 29 catalysts synthesised using five supports: Al2O3, activated carbon (AC), TiO2, ZrO2, MgO, and three promoters: Co, Cu, Ce (with two different Ce precursors) was performed. Then, the optimization of the Ni-Ce/Al2O3 catalyst was carried out by varying Ni loading (four levels) and Ce/Ni molar ratio (two levels). All these catalysts were screened for supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of lignin under the operating conditions of 650 degrees C, 26 MPa and water to biomass mass ratio of 5 in a tubular batch reactor. Various characterization techniques were used to investigate the properties of these catalysts further. As the result, using different supports, the activity of Ni-based catalysts for SCWG of lignin was found in the order of Al2O3 > TiO2 > AC > ZrO2 > MgO. As the best promoter, Ce enhanced the hydrogen selectivity by promoting the Ni dispersion and weakening the Ni-Al2O3 interaction. Use of different precursors for the Ce promoter (CeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O or Ce(NO3)(3)center dot 6H(2)O) showed no effect on the hydrogen yield. For a fixed Ni loading, hydrogen yield increased with an increase in Ce/Ni molar ratio. The 20Ni-0.36Ce/Al2O3 catalyst showed highest hydrogen yield of 2.15 mmol/g, which is 35% higher than that for non-catalytic run. The better performance of Ni-Ce/Al2O3 catalyst can be attributed to enhanced coke resistance as well as increased reducibility for Ni by addition of Ce promoter. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据