4.5 Article

Symptoms associated with environmental factors (SAEF) - Towards a paradigm shift regarding idiopathic environmental intolerance and related phenomena

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109955

关键词

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Environmental sensitivities; Multiple chemical sensitivities; Nocebo; Paradigm shift; Symptom perception

资金

  1. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [0396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Health conditions characterized by symptoms associated with chemical, physical and biological environmental factors unrelated to objectifiable pathophysiological mechanisms are often labelled by the general term idiopathic environmental intolerances. More specific, exposure-related terms are also used, e.g. multiple chemical sensitivities, electromagnetic hypersensitivity and candidiasis hypersensitivity. The prevalence of the conditions varies from a few up to more than 50%, depending on definitions and populations. Based on evolving knowledge within this field, we provide arguments for a paradigm shift from terms focusing on exposure and intolerance/(hyper-)sensitivity towards a term more in line with the perceptual elements that seem to underlie these phenomena. Symptoms caused by established pathophysiologic mechanisms should not be included, e.g. allergic or toxicological conditions, lactose intolerance or infections. We discuss different alternatives for a new term/concept and end up proposing an open and descriptive term, symptoms associated with environmental factors (SAEF), including a definition. Symptoms associated with environmental factors both is in line with the current knowledge and acknowledge the experiences of the afflicted persons. Thus, the proposed concept is likely to facilitate therapy and communication between health professionals and afflicted persons, and to provide a base for better understanding of such phenomena in healthcare, society and science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据