4.8 Article

State-of-health estimation and remaining useful life prediction for the lithium-ion battery based on a variant long short term memory neural network

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228069

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; State-of-health; Remaining useful life; Long short term memory; Active states tracking

资金

  1. Ministry of Education China Mobile Research Fund [MCM20180404]
  2. Chongqing Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project [cstc2018jcyjAX0167]
  3. Chongqing Artificial Intelligence Technology Innovation Major Theme Special Project [cstc2017rgzn-zdyfX0035]
  4. Chongqing Key Industries Common Key Technological Innovation Specialized [cstc2017zdcy-zdyfX0067]
  5. Key Research Program of Chongqing Science & Technology Commission [CSTC2017jcyjBX0025]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation Project of China [61703066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve state-of-health (SOH) estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction, a prognostic framework shared by multiple batteries is proposed. A variant long-short-term memory (LSTM) neural network (NN), called AST-LSTM NN, is designed to guarantee the performance of proposed framework. Firstly, the input and forget gates are coupled by a fixed connection, which leads simultaneous determination of old information and new data. Secondly, the element-wise product of the new inputs and the historical cell states is conducted for screening out more beneficial information. Thirdly, a peephole connection from the constant error carousel (CEC) is added into the output gate to shield the unwanted error signals. AST-LSTM NNs, with mapping structures of many-to-one and one-to-one, are well-trained separately for the prediction of SOH and RUL. Compared with other data-driven methods, the experiments carried on NASA dataset demonstrate our method hits lower average root mean square, 0.0216, and conjunct error, 0.0831, for SOH and RUL, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据