4.8 Article

Strongly coupled carbon encapsulated Ni-WO2 hybrids as efficient catalysts for water-to-hydrogen conversion via urea electro-oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 458, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228014

关键词

Carbon encapsulated catalyst; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Urea oxidation reaction; Oxygen evolution reaction; Overall urea oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872040]
  2. Hundred Talents Program of Guangxi Universities
  3. Excellence Scholars and Innovation Team of Guangxi Universities
  4. Dean Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology [2019Z009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical water splitting is a sustainable method to produce hydrogen (H-2), but it is limited by the large overpotential at anodic reaction. Using urea oxidation reaction (UOR) to replace oxygen evolution reaction (OER) can reduce the potential at anode and simultaneously purify the nitrogen-containing wastewater. Herein, the carbon encapsulated Ni-WO2 hybrids self-supported on nickel foam [denoted as (Ni-WO2)@C/NF] is synthesized via a hydrothermal method and then annealing in high temperature. The physicochemical characterizations indicate that the Ni-WO2 hybrids are encapsulated by carbon layer and the particles are evenly dispersed on the surface of nickel foam. It only needs a potential of 1.31 V and -77 mV for UOR and HER to produce a current density of 10 mA cm(-2), exhibited outstanding catalytic activity. Furthermore, it only requires 1.38 V to drive a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) for overall urea oxidation and lasting 80 h at 80 mA cm(-2) without attenuation, highlighting the stability. This good performance could be originated from the synergistic effect between nickel and tungsten oxide, the carbon-encapsulated and the self-supported structure. This work offers a promising method for cost-effective and energy-saving H-2 production and nitrogen-containing wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据