4.3 Article

The growth of the longitudinal beam-plasma instability in the presence of an inhomogeneous background

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS
卷 86, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022377820000215

关键词

astrophysical plasmas; plasma instabilities; space plasma physics

资金

  1. European Research Council under ERC-CoG grant CRAGSMAN [646955]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-1748958]
  3. Delaney family
  4. Perimeter Institute
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through a Discovery Grant
  6. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  7. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities
  8. NASA ATP program through NASA [NNH17ZDA001N-ATP]
  9. Programme National des Hautes Energies (France)
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [646955] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the longitudinal stability of beam-plasma systems in the presence of a density inhomogeneity in the background plasma. Previous works have focused on the non-relativistic regime where hydrodynamical models are used to evolve pre-existing Langmuir waves within inhomogeneous background plasmas. Here, for the first time we study the problem with kinetic equations in a fully relativistic way. We do not assume the existence of Langmuir waves, and we focus on the rate and the mechanism by which waves are excited in such systems from an initial perturbation. We derive the structure of the unstable modes and compute an analytical approximation for their growth rates. Our computation is limited to dilute and cold beams, and shows an excellent agreement with particle-in-cell simulations performed using the SHARP code. We show that, due to such an inhomogeneity, the virulent beam-plasma instabilities in the intergalactic medium are not suppressed but their counterparts in the solar wind can be suppressed as evidenced by propagating type-III solar radio bursts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据