4.0 Article

'MN-Clearwater', the first food-grade intermediate wheatgrass (Kernza perennial grain) cultivar

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 288-297

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/plr2.20042

关键词

-

资金

  1. Initiative for Renewable Energy & the Environment, University of Minnesota
  2. Minnesota Department of Agriculture
  3. Forever Green Initiative, University of Minnesota
  4. General Mills Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

'MN-Clearwater' (Reg. no. CV-287, PI 692651) is the world's first commercial food-grade intermediate wheatgrass [IWG; Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey subsp. intermedium] grain cultivar. It was developed as a synthetic population at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, and released in August 2019. Intermediate wheatgrass is a perennial grain crop currently undergoing domestication and is known for its extensive long root system that can recycle soil nutrients and sequester carbon. MN-Clearwater (experimental designation MN1504) was created by intercrossing seven parents selected for high grain yield, reduced shattering, high free grain threshing, reduced lodging, and uniform maturity. MN-Clearwater was advanced for two generations before being evaluated in statewide yield trials, after which the fourth seed generation was released as the cultivar in a limited public release. In variety trials across Minnesota, MN-Clearwater produced 696 kg ha(-1) (621 lb ac(-1)) of grain with minimal lodging and negligible disease levels. The first 2 yr produce the highest grain yields under Minnesota conditions, and third-year yields are significantly lower (average reduction of 77%) than the first 2 yr. As the first IWG cultivar released for sale under the Kernza trade name (The Land Institute), we expect this population to be a cornerstone resource for the IWG research community as well as for interested growers, food processors, and commercial partners. MN-Clearwater grain is sold as Kernza perennial grain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据