4.5 Article

Fabrication of a flexible graphene-TiO2/PDMS photocatalytic film by combining air atmospheric pressure glow discharge treatment

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.12.004

关键词

Titanium dioxide; Air atmospheric pressure glow discharge; Flexible; Poly (dimethyl siloxane); Photocatalysts film

资金

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT1146]
  2. Jiangsu Province [1302096C]
  3. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation of China [BK20141459]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303079]
  5. Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [10KJA430016]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reported a universal and effective route to fabricate a kind of flexible photocatalyst film to broaden the scope of application (wearable photocatalyst devices for example). This technology roadmap is premised on the air atmospheric pressure glow discharge (AAPGD) pretreatment. Through treating poly (dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) with AAPGD technique, the PDMS surface is functionalized by hydroxyl groups and the contact angle gains a minimum value of about 26.0, which make it easy to be decorated for the desired efficiency. Then the PDMS surface can be endowed with photocatalytic activity through wet chemical method without the bondage of inherent hydrophobic-nature. Owing to the hydrophilic surface, the graphene can be inserted to improve the photocatalytic performance and the flexibility of graphene was kept. Compared with the photocatalysts films without AAPGD pretreatment, the photocatalytic performance of films suffering from AAPGD pretreatment is much higher. Therefore this flexible film strategy, based on AAPGD pretreatment, is of great significance to design flexible photocatalysts films, pushing forward the development of wearable photocatalyst devices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据