4.6 Article

The Evolution of a Buoyant River Plume in Response to a Pulse of High Discharge from a Small Midlatitude River

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 50, 期 7, 页码 1915-1935

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-19-0127.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE1131238, OCE1260394, OCE1829979]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique feature of small mountainous rivers is that discharge can be elevated by an order of magnitude during a large rain event. The impact of time-varying discharge on freshwater transport pathways and alongshore propagation rates in the coastal ocean is not well understood. A suite of simulations in an idealized coastal ocean domain using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with varying steady background discharge conditions (25-100m(3) s(-1)), pulse amplitude (200-800m(3) s(-1)), pulse duration (1-6 days), and steady downwelling-favorable winds (0-4m s(-1)) are compared to investigate the downstream freshwater transport along the coast (in the direction of Kelvin wave propagation) following a discharge pulse from the river. The nose of the pulse propagates rapidly alongshore at 0.04-0.32m s(-1) (faster propagation corresponds with larger pulse volume and faster winds) transporting 13%-66% of the discharge. The remainder of the discharge volume initially accumulates in the bulge near the river mouth, with lower retention for longer pulse duration and stronger winds. Following the pulse, the bulge eddy disconnects from the river mouth and is advected downstream at 0-0.1m s(-1), equal to the depth-averaged wind-driven ambient water velocity. As it transits alongshore, it sheds freshwater volume farther downstream and the alongshore freshwater transport stays elevated between the nose and the transient bulge eddy. The evolution of freshwater transport at a plume cross section can be described by the background discharge, the passage of the pulse nose, and a slow exponential return to background conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据