4.6 Article

Reversible Energy Storage in Layered Copper-Based Coordination Polymers: Unveiling the Influence of the Ligand's Functional Group on Their Electrochemical Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 17, 页码 9215-9224

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01486

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMS [2019-018]
  2. JSPS Core-to-Core Program Chemistry and Physics of Coordination Nanosheets
  3. NIMS Battery Platform
  4. JSPS
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [18F18329, 19K15527, 19H05460]
  6. NIMS
  7. JST-CREST [JPMJCR15F2]
  8. MEXT, Japan
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H05460, 19K15527, 18F18329] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coordination polymers represent a suitable model for studying redox mechanisms in materials where both metal cations and ligands undergo electrochemical reactions and are capable of proceeding through reversible multielectron-transfer processes with the insertion of cations and anions into their open structures. Designing new coordination polymers for electrochemical energy storage with improved performance relays also on the understanding of their structure-property relationship. Here, we present a family of copper-based coordination polymer with hexafunctionalized benzene ligands forming a kagome-type layered structure, where the influence of the functional groups in their structure and electrochemical properties is investigated. Their chemical and structural properties have been explored by means of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier-transform infrared and Raman spectroscopies, followed by investigation of their electrochemical performance in Li half-cells by cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic cycling techniques. Ex situ PXRD, Raman, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry measurements of cycled electrodes have been carried out to provide insights into the redox mechanism of these copper-based coordination polymers as positive electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据