4.6 Article

Explicit Multielement Extension of the Spectral Neighbor Analysis Potential for Chemically Complex Systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 124, 期 26, 页码 5456-5464

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c02450

关键词

-

资金

  1. plasma surface interaction project of the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program - Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
  2. plasma surface interaction project of the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program - Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) programs within the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  3. Exascale Computing Project [17-SC-20-SC]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  5. National Nuclear Security Administration
  6. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A natural extension of the descriptors used in the Spectral Neighbor Analysis Potential (SNAP) method is derived to treat atomic interactions in chemically complex systems. Atomic environment descriptors within SNAP are obtained from a basis function expansion of the weighted density of neighboring atoms. This new formulation instead partitions the neighbor density into partial densities for each chemical element, thus leading to explicit multielement descriptors. For N-elem chemical elements, the number of descriptors increases as O(N-elem(3)), while the computational cost of the force calculation as implemented in LAMMPS is limited to O(N-elem(2)) and the favorable linear scaling in the number of atoms is retained. We demonstrate these chemically aware descriptors by producing an interatomic potential for indium phosphide capable of capturing high-energy defects that result from radiation damage cascades. This new explicit multielement SNAP method reproduces the relaxed defect formation energies with substantially greater accuracy than weighted-density SNAP, while retaining accurate representation of the bulk indium phosphide properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据