4.5 Article

Life Cycle Stages and Evidence of Sexual Reproduction in the Marine Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae, Prorocentrales)1

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 941-952

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12989

关键词

asynchronous division; desmoschisis; dinoflagellate; life cycle; planozygote; Prorocentrum minimum; sexual reproduction

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-34-00907]
  2. Budgetary Program at the Institute of Cytology RAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prorocentrum minimum is a potentially toxic marine dinoflagellate that often forms massive blooms in estuarine and coastal sea waters. In this study, the life cycle of P. minimum was investigated and sexual reproduction in culture was described for the first time. Morphology of the mitotic stages was revised and several distinguishing features from sexual steps were described. The sexual reproductive stages were observed in the stationary culture and compared with a well-studied closely related species, Prorocentrum micans. Prorocentrum minimum has a haplontic life cycle and homothallic sexual process. The gametes were isogamous and morphologically indistinguishable from the vegetative cells. Unlike P. micans, P. minimum isogametes fused, but did not conjugate, partially reorganizing their cell coverings. Newly formed planozygotes were distinguished by their irregular shape and a large asymmetrically located nucleus. No long-term resting cyst stages (hypnozygotes) were documented. The late planozygotes underwent meiosis and formed tetrads of cells. The second meiotic division could be delayed or arrested in one of the daughter nuclei leading to formation of trinucleate cells with three pairs of flagella. So, similar to P. micans, P. minimum may have two possible scenarios of sexual division: (a) formation of a four-cell stage through two successive divisions or (b) asynchronous divisions of the zygote. Changes in the DNA content were confirmed by quantitative image cytometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据