4.5 Article

Biorelevant Two-Stage In Vitro Testing for rDCS Classification and in PBPK Modeling-Case Example Ritonavir

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 109, 期 8, 页码 2512-2526

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.04.023

关键词

Dissolution; In vitro models; Developability; Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS); Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling; SimCyp PBPK modeling; In silico modeling; Amorphous solid dispersions (ASD); Precipitation; Supersaturation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biorelevant two-stage in vitro testing is increasingly used as a tool for various applications in drug development. Three important applications of two-stage in vitro testing are the classification of weakly basic drug compounds as part of the refined Developability Classification System, the prediction of intraluminal drug concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract and the prediction of plasma concentration profiles using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. For the weakly basic, antiretroviral drug ritonavir, two-stage testing is triggered as a customized investigation in the refined Developability Classification System classification process to assess whether the drug could supersaturate and precipitate when exposed to the steep change in pH that occurs during drug transfer from the stomach into the small intestine. It was shown that for 2 Norvir (R) formulations, a tablet and an oral powder formulation, the two-stage test yielded similar results to the more complex transfer model with regard to the supersaturation and precipitation behavior of these amorphous solid dispersion formulations. Furthermore, solubility and two-stage data were mechanistically modeled in the in vitro data Analysis Toolkit and the results used as input parameters for a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model built in the Simcyp Simulator. (c) 2020 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据