4.2 Article

Anticandidal activity of synthetic peptides: Mechanism of action revealed by scanning electron and fluorescence microscopies and synergism effect with nystatin

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/psc.3249

关键词

anticandidal action; Candida albicans; cell wall rupture; Mo-CBP3 peptides; pore formation; synthetic antimicrobial peptide

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -National Institute of Science and Technology of Bioinspiration [465507/2014-0]
  3. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation [2018/19546-7]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [306202/2017-4, 308107/2013-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans has emerged as a major public health problem in recent decades. The most important contributing factor is the rapid increase in resistance to conventional drugs worldwide. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides (SAMPs) have attracted substantial attention as alternatives and/or adjuvants in therapeutic treatments due to their strong activity at low concentrations without apparent toxicity. Here, two SAMPs, named Mo-CBP3-PepI (CPAIQRCC) and Mo-CBP3-PepII (NIQPPCRCC), are described, bioinspired by Mo-CBP3, which is an antifungal chitin-binding protein from Moringa oleifera seeds. Furthermore, the mechanism of anticandidal activity was evaluated as well as their synergistic effects with nystatin. Both peptides induced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell wall degradation, and large pores in the C. albicans cell membrane. In addition, the peptides exhibited high potential as adjuvants because of their synergistic effects, by increasing almost 50-fold the anticandidal activity of the conventional antifungal drug nystatin. These peptides have excellent potential as new drugs and/or adjuvants to conventional drugs for treatment of clinical infections caused by C. albicans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据