4.3 Article

Association between myotonometric measurement of masseter muscle stiffness and maximum bite force in healthy elders

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 750-756

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12968

关键词

bite force; masseter muscle; muscle stiffness; myotonometric assessment; occlusal force

资金

  1. Good Neighbors Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Maximum bite force (MBF) is a common and useful index of masticatory function; it correlates with physical strength in elderly people. Palpation of stiffness in the masseter muscle during forceful biting has been considered to be associated with MBF. However, this assessment method relies on subjective judgments; no study has verified the relationship between MBF and quantitative measurements of masseter muscle stiffness (MMS). Objective We aimed to verify the association between masseter muscle myotonometric assessment results and MBF. Methods In total, 117 community-dwelling >65-year-old individuals from the Tokyo metropolitan area were assessed. MMS on the dominant side during forceful biting was measured with a MyotonPRO device. Masseter muscle thickness (MMT) during rest and forceful biting was measured with an ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, and the difference in MMT (DMMT) between the rest and forceful biting conditions was determined. MBF data were obtained with a pressure-sensitive sheet and an associated device. To determine the independent variables affecting MBF and MMS, multivariate linear regression analyses with adjustments for age, sex and number of teeth were performed. Results The multivariate analysis revealed that MBF correlated with the number of teeth (beta = .489, P < .001) and MMS (beta = .259, P = .003) (R-2 = .433). MMS correlated with MBF (beta = .308, P = .003) and DMMT (beta = .430, P < .001) (R-2 = .326). Conclusion Masseter muscle stiffness possibly reflects a force generated by the masseter muscle during forceful biting. Therefore, MMS is effective to assess tooth loss as well as an index of masseter muscle strength when evaluating MBF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据