4.2 Article

Apigenin Regulates Activation of Microglia and Counteracts Retinal Degeneration

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2019.0163

关键词

photoreceptor degeneration; mouse; flavonoid; microglia

资金

  1. Rohto Pharmaceutical Co.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Photoreceptor degeneration is a major cause of blindness. Microglia are known to play key roles in the pathogenesis and progression of neural degeneration. We examined the possible use of apigenin, which is a naturally occurring flavonoid, for the treatment of photoreceptor degeneration through regulation of microglial activities. Methods: As in vitro analyses, BV2 and MG5 mouse microglia cell lines were stimulated in the presence or absence of apigenin, and their activation profile was examined. In vivo study was done using rd1 photoreceptor degeneration model, and apigenin was administered by intravitreal injection, and pathological feature was examined. Results: Cell survival was not affected by apigenin in either BV2 and MG5. Apigenin suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced chemokine production in both BV2 and MG5 cells, but phagocytosis was suppressed in MG5 cells but not in BV2 cells. Apigenin inhibited LPS-induced M1 activation but could not drive microglia toward the M2 phenotype. Apigenin suppressed the expression of miR-155 in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the Ets protein level was suppressed by treatment of BV2 cells with apigenin. When rd1 mice were treated with apigenin by intravitreal injection, the expression of inflammatory chemokines in the retina was reduced, and activation of microglia and Muller glia was suppressed. Furthermore, the thickness of the outer nuclear layer of the retina of rd1 mice was thicker in apigenin-treated retinas. Conclusions: Taken together, local administration of apigenin to the retina is a potential therapeutic treatment for photoreceptor degeneration, which involves downregulation of microglia in the retina when photoreceptors are damaged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据